Liz Magill — the president of the College of Pennsylvania — is stepping down after equivocating over the “genocide of Jews” and whether or not calling for that violated their guidelines.
The announcement over Magill’s resignation got here down Saturday straight from Penn itself — with an announcement from a member of the Board of Trustees studying … “I write to share that President Liz Magill has voluntarily tendered her resignation as President of the College of Pennsylvania. She is going to stay a tenured college member at Penn Carey Regulation.”
This follows a turbulent week on Capitol Hill, the place Magill and two different presidents of Ivy League universities — particularly, Harvard and MIT — have been grilled by lawmakers over the rise in antisemitism on faculty campuses after the Oct. 7 terrorist assaults in Israel.
When requested by Rep. Elise Stefanik, a Republican, if calling for the genocide of Jews, in and of itself, violated Penn’s guidelines or code of conduct … Magill gave a qualifying reply as a substitute of simply saying sure or no — basically explaining that it relied on the context.
A Video Message from President Liz Magill pic.twitter.com/GlPE3QZU4P
— Penn (@Penn) December 6, 2023
@Penn
Magill went on to say if the speech Stefanik referred to changed into precise motion, it may then probably represent harassment. Stefanik gave her one more alternative to reply extra straight — once more, over whether or not calling for the genocide of Jews was a rule-breaker — and Magill stored giving conditional responses … which changed into a testy alternate.
That every one went viral, and Magill later apologized in a video posted to Penn’s social media pages — the place she was rather more clear … sure, calling for the genocide of Jews is clearly in violation of the college’s insurance policies — one thing she ought to’ve simply stated up entrance.
TMZ.com
Nearly everybody was shocked that Magill would not simply acknowledge that what Stefanik was (actually) asking was horrible and never according to the college’s values — even when there’s nuanced context to what precisely college college students are saying/protesting for on campus.
We received into this problem additional with a MIT free speech advocate … who gave us a puzzling response as to whether the KKK calling for the genocide of African-People on a school campus can be met with the identical sort of response as calling for the genocide of Jews.
Apparently, it would be handled in another way … however the causes for why are nonetheless unclear, it appears.
In fact, this all stems from the continued battle between Israel and Hamas — which has thrust harmless individuals into the combo … and has spurred lots of people throughout the nation to hit the streets to voice help … principally for Palestine. Lots of that rhetoric although — particularly, criticizing Zionism — has been seen as outright antisemitic hate speech by some.
As with all the pieces … it is all case by case, and specificity issues. With that stated, it ought to go with out saying … calling for the genocide of any group of individuals is totally flawed.